Comparative Productive Performance of two Broiler Strains in Open Housing System

Naqash Khalid, Malik Mohsin Ali, Zubair Ali, Yasir Amin, Muhammad Ayaz

Abstract


Background: The present study was conducted to compare the growth performance and ultimately to calculate the profitability of the two locally available commercial strains of broiler (Ross 308 and Cobb 500).

Methods: For the purpose of study, 900 number of day-old chicks (DOC) of each strain were purchased from the local market. The birds were reared in conventional broiler house with the provision of standard managemental conditions throughout the experimental period. The parameters recorded on weekly basis were feed intake, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and mortality.

Results: Result shown that the total body weight of Cobb-500 and Ross-308 on 1st week was 207.40±14 gram and 196.00±16 gram respectively and these result represented significant difference of weight gain (P<0.05) on 1st week of experiment among both the strains. From 2nd week of experiment till the last week (5th week) the results shown the total body weight of Cob-500 and Ross-308 as 2180.4±38 gram and 2103.7±36 gram respectively which was non-significantly different (P>0.05) among the strains. Furthermore, significant difference of feed conversion ratio (FCR) was observed (P<0.05) among both the strains but from day 7th till the market age weekly FCR of Cob-500 was significantly higher (P<0.05) than Ross-308. Comparatively high mortality (4.8±0.4%) was noticed in Ross broiler strain than Cobb broiler strain (3.7±0.4%). 

Conclusion: It was concluded from the current study that the Cobb-500 is performing better in conventional open housing system at high altitude than Ros-308.

Keywords: Broiler; Cobb-500; Ross-308; Conventional broiler houses; Mortality


Full Text:

PDF

References


Do Nascimento DCN, Dourado LRB, De Siqueira JC, De Lima SBP, da Silva MdCM, et al. Productive features of broiler chickens in hot weather: effects of strain and sex. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, (2018); 39(2): 731-746.

Vercoe J, Fitzhugh H, Von Kaufmann R. Livestock productions systems beyond 2000. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, (2000); 13(Supl S): 411-419.

Mahmood MS, Sabir R. Preparation and evaluation of avian influenza (H9) and Newcastle disease (thermostable i-2 strain) bivalent vaccine for commercial poultry. Agrobiological Records, (2021) 3: 17-23.

Singh VP, Sharma V, Sidhu M, Kingra H. Broiler Production in Punjab—An Economic Analysis §. Agricultural Economics Research Review, (2010); 23(2): 315-324.

Talebi A, Asri-Rezaei S, Rozeh-Chai R, Sahraei R. Comparative studies on haematological values of broiler strains (Ross, Cobb, Arbor-acres and Arian). International journal of poultry science, (2005); 4(8): 573-579.

Tona K, Onagbesan O, Kamers B, Everaert N, Bruggeman V, et al. Comparison of Cobb and Ross strains in embryo physiology and chick juvenile growth. Poultry Science, (2010); 89(8): 1677-1683.

Sterling K, Pesti G, Bakalli R. Performance of different broiler genotypes fed diets with varying levels of dietary crude protein and lysine. Poultry Science, (2006); 85(6): 1045-1054.

Havenstein G, Ferket P, Qureshi M. Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poultry science, (2003); 82(10): 1500-1508.

Raheel IAR, Orabi A, El Masry A. Natural herbs CLEANACTIV®; immune-modulator, health activator and growth promoter in broiler chickens. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences, (2019); 8(4): 267-270.

Pascalau S, Cadar M, Raducu C, Marchis Z. Evaluation of productive performances in Ross 308 and Cobb 500 hybrids. Animal Biology & Animal Husbandry, (2017); 9(1): 22-27.

Marcu A, Vacaru-Opriş I, Dumitrescu G, Ciochina LP, Marcu A, et al. The influence of the genotype on economic efficiency of broiler chickens growth. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, (2013); 46(2): 339-346.

Hascik P, Kacaniova M, Mihok M, Pochop J, Benczova E, et al. Performance of various broiler chicken hybrids fed with commercially produced feed mixtures. International Journal of Poultry Science, (2010); 9(11): 1076-1082.

Ciurescu G, Grosu H. Efficiency of feed utilization by different hybrids of broiler chicks. Archiva Zootechnica, (2011); 14(2): 36.

Cheema MA, Qureshi M, Havenstein G. A comparison of the immune profile of commercial broiler strains when raised on marginal and high protein diets. Int J Poult Sci, (2003); 2300-312.

Strakova E, Suchý P, Navratil P, Karel T, Herzig I. Comparison of the content of crude protein and amino acids in the whole bodies of cocks and hens of Ross 308 and Cobb 500 hybrids at the end of fattening. Ile, (2015); 10(9.2): 8-9.

Awaad MHH, Elmenawey MA, Afify MA, Zouelfekar SA, Mohamed FF, et al. The impact of high stocking density and saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii on productive performance, intestinal microbiota and gut integrity of broiler chickens. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences, (2019); 8(4): 362-370.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62940/als.v8i2.879

Refbacks