Evaluation of BACTEC™ FX and BacT/Alert™ Automated Blood Culture Systems for Detection of Clinically Relevant Bacterial and Yeast Species

Muhammad Absar, Ibraheem Alshahrani, Fahd Nashmy, Mosa Salami, Ali Hadadi, Aous AlMarzooq, Alhussain AlAsiri, Abdulaziz AlRashidi, Mohammed AlFaifi

Abstract


Background: Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a significant health concern, necessitating effective diagnostic tools. This study evaluates the performance of the BD Bactec FX system in comparison to the established BacT/Alert system, examining mean time till detection (TTD) across various blood culture bottles.

Methods: The study involves 148 blood culture bottles, inoculated with representative bacterial ATCC strains (n= 15) and 04 yeast isolates. Parallel testing is conducted by seeding 10–30 colony-forming units (CFU) in duplicate in both BD Bactec FX and BacT/Alert systems. TTD is assessed across aerobic, anaerobic, and pediatric bottles for diverse microbial species.

Results: All 148 bottles tested in parallel show positive signals in both systems. BD Bactec FX demonstrates significantly shorter TTD for adult-seeded cultures in aerobic and anaerobic bottles compared to BacT/Alert Similarly, pediatric bottles with BD Bactec FX exhibit a shorter TTD compared to BacT/Alert. The statistical significance of TTD, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values is evident for Bactec FX aerobic, anaerobic, and pediatric bottles across tested organisms. Notable examples of faster TTD include; Bacteroides ovatus (16.6h by Bactec FX vs. 70.5h by Bact/Alert 3D), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (33.7h vs. 72.5h), and Streptococcus pyogenes (8.1h vs. 11.9h).

Conclusions: In conclusion, the study’s findings demonstrate that BD Bactec FX surpasses BacT/Alert in prompt microbial detection, showcasing potential for early identification of bacteremia and fungemia. Faster TTD implies the potential to initiate timely antimicrobial treatment, thereby reducing patient morbidity and mortality. However, exceptions in certain microbial species highlight the need for comprehensive clinical validation to establish the broad applicability of these findings.

Keywords: Blood Culture System; Recovery Rate; Time to detection; Blood stream infection; BTA3D; Bactec FX  


Full Text:

PDF

References


Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, Murphy DJ, Seymour CW, et al. Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014. The Journal of the American Medical Association, (2017); 318(13): 1241-1249.

Hattori H, Maeda M, Nagatomo Y, Takuma T, Niki Y, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for mortality in bloodstream infections: A single-center retrospective study in Japan. American Journal of Infection Control, (2018); 46(12): e75-e79.

Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, et al. Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007). Chest, (2011); 140(5): 1223-1231.

Goto M, Al-Hasan MN. Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, (2013); 19(6): 501-509.

Palmer HR, Palavecino EL, Johnson JW, Ohl CA, Williamson JC. Clinical and microbiological implications of time-to-positivity of blood cultures in patients with Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, (2013); 32(7): 955-959.

Ferrer R, Martin-Loeches I, Phillips G, Osborn TM, Townsend S, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Critical Care Medicine Journal, (2014); 42(8): 1749-1755.

Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. The Lancet, (2010); 376(9749): 1339-1346.

Lamy B, Dargere S, Arendrup MC, Parienti JJ, Tattevin P. How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art. Frontiers in Microbiology, (2016); 7: 697.

Armstrong-Briley D, Hozhabri NS, Armstrong K, Puthottile J, Benavides R, et al. Comparison of length of stay and outcomes of patients with positive versus negative blood culture results. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, (2015); 28(1): 10-13.

Boev C, Kiss E. Hospital-Acquired Infections: Current Trends and Prevention. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, (2017); 29(1): 51-65.

Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Medicine, (2017); 43(3): 304-377.

Zhang J, Yang F, Sun Z, Fang Y, Zhu H, et al. Rapid and precise identification of bloodstream infections using a pre-treatment protocol combined with high-throughput multiplex genetic detection system. BMC Infectious Diseases, (2022); 22(1): 823.

Wilson ML, Mitchell M, Morris AJ, Murray PR, Reimer LG, et al. CLSI. Principles and Procedures for Blood Cultures; Approved Guideline. Approved Guideline. In., vol. 27, No. 17, M47-A edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, (2007).

O'Hara CM. Manual and automated instrumentation for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other aerobic gram-negative bacilli. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, (2005), 18(1): 147-162.

"Standard Deviation Calculator" at https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/statistics/standard-deviation-calculator.php from CalculatorSoup, https://www.calculatorsoup.com – Online Calculators, accessed October 5, 2023).

MedCalc Software Ltd. Comparison of means calculator. https://www.medcalc.org/calc/comparison_of_means.php (Version 22.013; accessed October 5, 2023).

Khatib R, Saeed S, Sharma M, Riederer K, Fakih MG, et al. Impact of initial antibiotic choice and delayed appropriate treatment on the outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, (2006); 25(3): 181-185.

Rosa RG, Goldani LZ. Cohort study of the impact of time to antibiotic administration on mortality in patients with febrile neutropenia. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, (2014); 58(7): 3799-3803.

Mueller-Premru M, Jeverica S, Papst L, Nagy E. Performance of two blood culture systems to detect anaerobic bacteria. Is there any difference? Anaerobe, (2017), 45: 59-64.

Almuhayawi M, Altun O, Abdulmajeed AD, Ullberg M, Ozenci V. The Performance of the Four Anaerobic Blood Culture Bottles BacT/ALERT-FN, -FN Plus, BACTEC-Plus and -Lytic in Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria and Identification by Direct MALDI-TOF MS. PLoS One, (2015); 10(11): e0142398.

Rocchetti A, Di Matteo L, Bottino P, Foret B, Gamalero E, et al. Prospective study of the clinical performance of three BACTEC media in a modern emergency department: Plus Aerobic/F, Plus Anaerobic/F, and Anaerobic Lytic/F. Journal of Microbiological Methods, (2016); 130: 129-132.

Kim J, Lee Y, Park Y, Kim M, Choi JY, et al. Anaerobic Bacteremia: Impact of Inappropriate Therapy on Mortality. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, (2016); 48(2): 91-98.

Vena A, Munoz P, Alcala L, Fernandez-Cruz A, Sanchez C, et al. Are incidence and epidemiology of anaerobic bacteremia really changing? European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, (2015); 34(8): 1621-1629.

Roh KH, Kim JY, Kim HN, Lee HJ, Sohn JW, et al. Evaluation of BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia in ICU patients. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, (2012); 73(3): 239-242.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62940/als.v11i3.2958

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.