Enhancing Indigenous Knowledge to Enhance Food Security in Rice Field Agroecosystems of Pinrang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia

Full Length Research Article 

Enhancing Indigenous Knowledge to Enhance Food Security in Rice Field Agroecosystems of Pinrang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia

Ida Rosada1*, Nurliani1, Farizah Dhaifina Amran1, Nurhapsa2, Sitti Nurani Sirajuddin3

Adv. life sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 84-91, February 2024
*Corresponding Author: Ida Rosada (ida.rosada@umi.ac.id)
Authors' Affiliations

 1. Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muslim – Indonesia
2. Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, and Fisheries, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare – Indonesia
3. Department of Socio Economic, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas Hasanuddin – Indonesia 
 
[Date Received: 12/07/2023; Date Revised: 08/12/2023; Date Published: 25/02/2024]


Abstractaa download_button
Introduction
Methods
Results

Discussion
References 


Abstract

Background: The traditional agricultural system is a cultivation system that has been passed down from generation to generation so that it becomes the local knowledge of farmers in carrying out cultivation activities. Traditional agriculture in Samaulue Village still maintains local wisdom. In the life of the community, there are social values that form local wisdom and have become part of everyday life.

Methods: The population in this study were all farmer households in Samaulue Village. The number of research samples was 50 rice farmer households. The method of determining the sample using a simple random sampling. The analytical method used in exploring the potential for local wisdom values in supporting food security is a qualitative descriptive method and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). This research is a qualitative research.

Results: There are three forms of local wisdom that were carried out before planting, three during the provision of seeds and the initial planting, and the traditions before harvest and harvest that are still being carried out are two. The dimensions of food security from the aspect of food availability, people rely on the availability of food that comes from their land, buying at local markets or rice selling kiosks or at rice mills in their area; in terms of food access, the main food needs of the families are fulfilled from agricultural products, while for additional food needs and daily needs are available in stalls or shops and kiosks; lastly for the food absorption dimension, the families underwent a pattern of eating three times a day.

Conclusion: Local wisdom which refers to local culture in rice farming production activities includes: tudang sipulung, mappalili and mappammula (pre-planting activities), mampo and mappammula mattaneng (seed provision and initial planting activities). The form of local wisdom is preparing food reserves in the household because the tradition of mappatala (eating together), pamali (not allowed) to empty the rice container (pabbarassengeng) in the house and has brought the rice field agro-ecosystem community never experiencing hunger, even though there is a scarcity of rice.

Keywords: Local Wisdom; Food Security; Rice Field Agroecosystem; Production; Consumption  

Introduction6th button-01


Agriculture sector plays a crucial role in economic development for many countries. Many parties are trying to develop this sector in many ways. In developing agriculture, considering the food production only is not enough, there are farmers who need to be considered when people want to develop agriculture sector, like how farmers live, how farmers are doing farming etc. It is a holistic thinking in developing agriculture. Future challenges in agriculture will become all parties’ responsibility [1,2].

Agriculture is one of the main components in sustaining life. Agriculture has an important role, one of which is as a provider of food needs that are needed by the community to ensure food security. The higher the growth of the human population, the higher the need for food. Household food security is one of the important levels because even though an area is categorized as food secure, food security does not necessarily reach the household level [3]. According to [4], this is because food security is influenced by 2 main factors, namely availability and accessibility.

In agricultural activities, there are two types of cultivation systems, namely traditional agricultural systems or also known as traditional cultivation and modern agricultural systems. The traditional cultivation system is a cultivation system that has been passed down from generation to generation so that it becomes the local knowledge of farmers in carrying out cultivation activities. This local knowledge system gives us an overview of the wisdom of community traditions in utilizing natural and social resources wisely with reference to the balance and sustainability of the environment.

Traditional agriculture that has developed in the community over the years should be able to conclude that by using this system, traditional farming communities have succeeded in providing food for one generation of farmers to the next. Local wisdom is the most important aspect of traditional farming systems. Local wisdom is often interpreted as local knowledge, which contains knowledge and various strategies in answering various problems related to the environment, meeting food needs, and community adaptation strategies in the face of changes in the natural and social environment.

The agricultural sector is a leading sector in South Sulawesi Province, especially in Pinrang Regency. One of the prominent agricultural subsectors is food crops, namely rice. Based on data from [5], Pinrang District has a potential rice paddy area of ± 44,861 Ha (22.87% of Pinrang district area), with rice production of 625,312 tons or about 4.89 percent of the total rice production of South Sulawesi Province.

Samaulue Village is one of the villages that has the highest rice production and productivity in Lanrisang Sub-district. This is because many wet-rice farmers have been cultivating modern (advanced) and semi-modern wet-rice; with the development of the times, rice farming has developed from traditional farming to advanced (modern) farming. Traditional agriculture in Samaulue Village still maintains local wisdom. In the life of the community, there are social values that form local wisdom and have become part of everyday life.

Local wisdom is defined as the wisdom or knowledge possessed by a community in order to manage the environment, namely knowledge that gives birth to behavior as a result of their adaptation to the environment, the implication of which is the sustainability and continuity of the environment for the long term [6]. Local wisdom [7] becomes a potential energy and strength that can guide the community to develop a set of activities that meet the needs of life that still responds to the conditions of the natural environment. Acting locally in anthropological terms is often juxtaposed with activities to understand and preserve local wisdom [8].

In agriculture, indigenous knowledge can be in the form of knowledge about farming systems and crop production, such as the right time for preparation, planting and harvesting; tillage practices, plant propagation methods; seed processing and storage; cropping, harvesting and storage practices; food processing and marketing; crop pest management systems and crop protection methods [9].

Local wisdom refers to the knowledge that comes from the community’s experiences and the accumulation of local knowledge [10]. In rural areas, local wisdom has become the part of people life. Farmers as people who dominate the livelihood involving local wisdom in their farming activities. Local communities are meeting the challenge that people are struggling to choose protecting environment through local wisdom or losing environment for economic benefit [11].

Agriculture, especially rice production, is a field of life that contains a lot of local wisdom. All rice production processes, pre-harvest and post-harvest, utilize traditional techniques that contain local values, norms and wisdom. But after the introduction of post-harvest rice technology, local wisdom was slowly shifted, and people almost forgot about it. The reason is because technology makes all work easier, in a short time and increases rice production. This certainly should not be allowed, because local wisdom is an instrument that makes the Indonesian nation known as a nation that gets along well and respects the culture of its people. So, it is necessary to conduct research on local wisdom in the production and consumption activities of farmers in Pinrang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. 

Methods6th button-01


The research was carried out in Samaulue Village, Lanrisang District, Pinrang Regency. The determination of the research location was carried out purposively with the consideration that the area is a rice field agroecosystem type area and generally the livelihoods of the community are farmers.

The population in this study were all farmer households in Samaulue Village. According to [12] if the population is >100 and homogeneous, a sample of 10-15% of the population can be taken. There are 502 farmers in Samaulue Village, so by taking 10%, the number of research samples is 50 households of wet-rice farmers. The sampling method used simple random sampling. The research took place from June to August 2021. The analysis method used in exploring the potential of local wisdom values in supporting food security is descriptive qualitative method and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). This research is qualitative research. The data/information obtained as material for analysis is the main data and information in this study are respondents. Data collection methods through interviews, observation and documentation. In this study, researchers captured information using an interview guide (questionnaire) in the form of questions that researchers had prepared beforehand.

Data analysis used a qualitative descriptive analysis method with an interactive model as proposed by [13]. This model consists of three main things, namely data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing/verification. These three things are intertwined during and after data collection is carried out, so that it seems to form an interactive cycle.

Results6th button-01


Respondents’ Characteristics

The identity of a farmer is important to know in order to give an idea of how long he has worked in agriculture. Respondents in this study were farmers who cultivated wet-rice crops. The identity observed includes age, education level, farming experience, number of family dependents, land area and alternative occupation. The identity of the respondents is shown in Table 1.

Local Wisdom in Rice Farming Production System

Local wisdom commonly had been obtained from previous generations and being practice daily [14]. How those local wisdom had born still become a secret, but people believe that what their ancestors were doing is correct and need to be preserved. In some programs, from government or other parties, local wisdom plays important role to make the program success [15]. To make the local wisdom can be useful for any program, the local wisdom needs to be learnt with global perspectives [16,17].

Local wisdom is a view of life and science as well as various life strategies in the form of activities carried out by local communities in answering various problems in meeting their needs. In foreign languages, it is often conceptualized as local wisdom or local knowledge or local genius. Local wisdom or environmental wisdom has existed in people's lives since ancient times until now. Local wisdom in agriculture is not only concerned with food yields, but also with maintaining the health of the surrounding environment [18].

Local wisdom in rice farming is practiced by rice farmers in Samaulue Village, Lanrisang Subdistrict, Pinrang Regency from pre-planting to harvesting activities. The farming community of Samaulue Village has a special knowledge system that is used to carry out farming starting from the preparation stage to the harvest stage.

Local Wisdom in Consumption Activities

In terms of household consumption, farmers in rural areas are also familiar with various local wisdoms, starting from the stage of selecting food ingredients to serving/serving it to all family members. Local wisdom in family consumption have existed for long time in Indonesia, the country is known to have various beneficial habits related to consuming healthy food [19]. Various kinds of local wisdom exist in rural communities, especially in Samaulue Village, which are still carried out by housewives in supporting household consumption activities.

 

Figures & Tables

 

 

 

Discussion6th button-01


Table 1 shows that the age of respondents is generally between 20 and 55 years old (80%). This shows that the age of respondents is generally still classified as productive age. In addition, the results of research conducted by [20] showed that in general, younger and healthier farmers have strong physical abilities and more quickly accept new things that are recommended, this is because younger farmers are more willing to take risks. The results of the study are in line with the opinion of [21] that the productive age in farming is the age between 15-50 years. Furthermore, [22] found that the young generation does not appreciate about the function contained in a tradition including local wisdom.

The level of education is one of the factors that has a considerable influence on the ability of farmers to absorb or receive information. Generally, the education level of respondent households in the research location is elementary school and high school (70%). This shows that the average education of farmers in the study area is still low so that it will affect the absorption of information. In this study area, farmers obtained non-formal education through agricultural extension activities and the formation of farmer groups. The active role of non-formal education causes farmers to accept new technology provided by the government through agricultural extension workers (PPL). This is in line with the purpose of agricultural extension as a means of providing knowledge, improving skills and changing farmers' attitudes in farming [23].

In addition to education, farming experience also affects the success of farming. The longest experience of paddy rice farming in the study area was in the range of 1-17 years as many as 26 people (52%), 18-35 years as many as 15 people (30%) and 36-50 as many as 9 people (18%). The average experience of respondents in rice farming is 21 years. Experience shows the level of interaction both in terms of time and quality of events that are passed in a person's life in his environment. The experience of farming is long enough then, farmers have high experience so that they can manage their farms well and will have a positive effect on the adoption of technological innovations [24] .

 The highest number of family members of farmers in the class interval 2 – 3 people, namely 40 families or 80%, while the least number of family members 0 -1 people, namely 10 families or 20%. The average number of family members is 3 people. In farming activities, the number of family members will be profitable because it is a source of labor in managing the farm. However, the greater the number of family members will affect the amount of expenditure in the household. [25] said that with a large number of family dependents, it can spur farmers/heads of families to increase productivity and farm yields on the land they cultivate because of the large number of family members they have to support.

The size of the respondents' farms varies, the largest land area is in the interval 0.25 Ha – 1.5 Ha as many as 42 people (84%). The least land area is owned by respondents in the interval 2.86 Ha – 4 Ha, totaling 2 people (4%) and the average land area is 1.07 Ha. Land is vital in the agricultural business as one of the main capitals of this sector. The larger the area of agricultural land owned, the greater the potential for production. Awareness of the importance of land for agriculture should be balanced with awareness to maintain environmental balance, so that nutrient sources for the soil can remain fulfilled so that land utilization can also be carried out [26].

Table 2 shows that there are 3 (three) forms of local wisdom that were carried out before planting, namely tudang sipulung, mappamula and mappalili. There are 3 (three) local wisdoms that were carried out during the provision of seeds and the initial planting, namely maddoja bine, mampo and mappamula mattaneng where the Maddoja bine tradition has begun to be abandoned by the community (farmers) now and the traditions before harvest and harvest that are still being carried out are 2 ( two) namely mapposoro and mappadendang.

Tudang sipulung means gathering. Tudang sipulung in local language is sitting together. Tudang sipulung is carried out before planting/sowing the seeds. This tudang sipulung is a discussion carried out by the farming community in the rice field agro ecosystem to determine the initial design/planning before starting to cultivate the land.

Narration of "Km", that Tudang sipulung is a ceremony carried out before planting seeds, eating together (manre sipulung), or sitting together (tudang sipulung), as a form of participation in making decisions in agriculture. Tudang sipulung is a farmer meeting, where they gather and convey their suggestions or complaints related to agriculture. The purpose of tudang sipulung is to produce an agreement between the government and the farming community in terms of determining the planting plan, what type of technology will be used and what means are needed by the farming community in carrying out their farming business.

Mappalili is one of the local wisdoms of the farming community in the rice field agro ecosystem which is still practiced by most of the people in Samaulue Village. Mappalili comes from the word palili which means to protect rice plants from something that will disturb or destroy them. More specifically, this mappalili activity is to pray together for the success of the farming being carried out and to avoid disasters that might befall their farming so that this mappalili activity is still carried out. The implementation of the mappalili event is usually accompanied by collecting various types of equipment used in farming which is then given a spell in the form of a prayer to Allah SWT by religious leaders. The aim is that the equipment used can help them and in the hope of generate abundant production. The results of this study are in line with the findings of [27] which stated that the level of perception of the farmers of Manakku Village, Labbakang District, Pangkep Regency regarding the local wisdom of the Mappalili tradition is very good.

The Mappamula tradition, as one of the local wisdoms in Samaulue Village, is still carried out because some people still believe in the existence of supernatural powers and supernatural powers which can cause failure to obtain crops from the commodities they cultivate. The mappammula activity has become a suggestion that has become a motivator for most of the people in Samaulue Village that they trust, therefore the Mappammula tradition is still being carried out today even though some people now do not believe in it and carry out the tradition only out of habit.

The activities of providing seeds and initial planting are termed in the local language called Mampo and Mappamula taneng. Mampo is spreading seeds/or planting seeds in the rice fields, but in this activity, there are no special activities in the form of special ceremonies, only usually farmers before carrying out mampo activities read "Bismillah" with prayer and sincere intentions to rest their hopes on the Almighty and hope for the results of their farming provide high production from the previous growing season. This local wisdom is generally carried out by the farming community in Samaulue Village because farming activities require that these two activities are absolutely necessary because it will not be possible to expect production results from farming if you do not do this activity (sowing seeds and starting planting). The research findings are in line with the findings of [28], before starting to spread seeds on cultivated moor land, farmers in Pacarejo Village usually carry out a tradition that has been passed down for generations. This tradition is called the wiwitan tradition, the tradition is intended and carried out as a form of farmer's belief in Dewi Sri so that production is abundant.

Local wisdom in the form of a traditional reaping ceremony or commonly termed harvesting is carried out in two processes, namely before harvest (Mappasoro) and postharvest (Mappadendang). The implementation of Mapposoro activities is usually carried out when the rice has started to turn yellow and is ready to be harvested. This activity is carried out by each landowner by preparing a set of offerings such as sticky rice (Sokko in the local language), organic chicken eggs and bananas. The provision of these offerings is meant to repel reinforcements before harvesting.

Mappadendang activities are carried out after harvesting. Mappadendang local wisdom is an expression from farmers and community members for the success of the results of their one year of farming as a form of gratitude and to get blessings from God. The Mappadendang activity has become a symbol in the community for rice field agro-ecosystems which are carried out en-masse, especially when there is a big harvest. This activity involves farmers, the community and village apparatus together to become a cultural party with mattojang/mappere attractions/performances (playing and competing on traditional swings) and various arts and cultural activities in the local community. Based on the research done by [29], it was found that there are three functions of post-harvest rituals, namely the religious-spiritual function of connecting humans with an almighty substance that is considered capable of helping humans in carrying out farming activities), social functions (becoming a bridge of integrative social relations, both among the residents themselves) and psychological functions (raising new beliefs that they have become individuals with clean souls).

Various local wisdoms in production activities that are still carried out by the farming community in Samaulue Village have created a new spirit in the community's soul to face the new planting season. Farmers generally adapt to the surrounding environment due to the limited knowledge they have, such as in processing land in a traditional way, limited capital and simple tools used in working. Therefore, the resulting production is still low and in the end the income will be much lower. Based on these conditions, farmers then try to develop in terms of the use of agricultural tools, but in their management, they still maintain local wisdom in the village. This is done with the aim of increasing the production and income of farmers [30]. Moreover, [31,32] mentioned that local knowledge owned by farmers for generations had adapted to environmental condition as an effort to maintain land productivity sustainability in a short term and prevent a decrease in soil productivity in a long term. On top of that, it is also necessary to maintain the community’s health in order to achieve social development.

Based on the data in Table 3, the results of interviews and FGD activities provide information that the dimensions of food security from the aspect of food availability in Samaulue Village, people rely on the availability of food that comes from their land, buying at local markets or rice selling kiosks or at rice mills in their area. Households in Samaulue Village have a habit of storing the produce from their farming activity in their private barns. Additionally, respondents also usually consume glutinous rice which is processed into "Sokko" (glutinous rice) for certain traditional events or activities. Other food sources owned come from livestock (cows, goats and chickens).

The dimension of food security from the aspect of food access, the main food needs of the families of the Samaulue Village are fulfilled from agricultural products, while for additional food needs and daily needs are available in stalls or shops and kiosks and to get the people's daily needs there is one local market in Samaulue Village. This is in line with the results of research from [33] which stated that farming households have direct access to the staple food, namely rice. This is because farmer households have direct access in the form of rice fields which are the foundation for rice farming.

The dimension of food security from the aspect of food absorption, the respondents underwent a pattern of eating three times a day, the respondents consumed rice, vegetables and fish as side dishes. For fruits, people consumed bananas, papayas, or watermelons. Consumption of food other than the staple food rice, farmers in Samaulue Village also consume meals that can replace rice. The meals that are often consumed by the respondents are “Pule Warelle” (mashed and steamed corn like rice and topped with grated coconut) and “Pule Utti” (pureed and steamed young bananas and topped with grated coconut) and also consume tubers.

The results of the FGD also provided examples of local wisdom in fulfilling food security (production, distribution and consumption stages), namely: it is not permissible (pamali) to take rice from the rice storage to give to others, because it could be difficult later in providing food in the household; the rice storage cannot be empty (denawedding kosong “pabbaressengngeng”): Pabbaressengngeng (local language of the Bugis tribe: namely the place to store rice in the house; the people in Samaulue Village have a habit when they eat they always do the “Mappatala Tradition” (eating together) so that food is distributed evenly to all family members. Eating together becomes an activity for all family members so that togetherness in the family can occur. In addition, the community also carries out a message of wisdom from their parents that when eating, food should not be left and when eating, food should not be scattered.

Based on the description on the results of the research it is concluded that:

1.      Local wisdom that refers to local culture in the cultivation of rice field agro-ecosystems in production activities includes: tudang sipulung, mappalili and mappammula (pre-planting activities) and mampo, also mappammula mattaneng (seed provision activities and initial planting).

2.      The form of local wisdom is to prepare food reserves in the household, the tradition of mappatala (eating together), pamali (not allowed) to empty the rice container (pabbarassengeng) in the house has an impact on the rice field agro-ecosystem community which never experiencing hunger, even though there is a scarcity of rice, because the community has independently prepared food reserves. 

In general, the management of rice field resources in Pinrang Regency needs to consider the wealth of existing local wisdom and carefully identify the social characteristics of the community in order to form values that are realized in everyday life as a basis and philosophy in building harmony, harmony between humans and the surrounding natural environment, so as to bring optimal results.

Conflict of Interest


The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions


The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: I. Rosada; data collection: Nurliani; analysis and interpretation of results: I. Rosada, Nurhapsa; draft manuscript preparation and translation: F. D. Amran; article submission: S. N. Sirajuddin. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

6th button-01References


  1. Rozaki Z, Oki W, Khamsing K, Emil S. Review; Farmer’s Local Wisdom on Natural Resources. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, (2020); 1(1): 25-32.
  2. Wijaya O. Strategi Pengembangan Komoditas Pangan Unggulan dalam Menunjang Ketahanan Pangan Wilayah (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Batang, Propinsi Jawa Tengah). AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, (2017); 3(1): 48–56.
  3. Ariani M, H P Saliem, G S Hardono, T B Purwantini. Wilayah Rawan Pangan dan Gizi Kronis di Papua, Kalimantan Barat, dan Jawa Timur. (2007); Departemen Pertanian.
  4. Saragih B. Mengatasi Masalah Gizi dan Pangan di Indonesia dengan Pendekatan Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga. (2017); Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  5. BPS. Sulawesi Selatan dalam Angka. (2021); Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.
  6. Suhartini. Kajian Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan. (2009); Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA. Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  7. Tirsa O. Praktik-Praktik Kearifan Lokal dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Pertanian Padi Sawah. (2012); Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  8. Nurjannah, T Simarmata, Supsiloani, T Andayani, A Febryani, B K Amal. The Implementation of Local Wisdom Education Global Insights in Institutional and Local Wisdom of Culture in North Sumatera Subject in Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Medan. 1st International Conference on Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies (ICSSIS 2018). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), (2019); 208: 138–143.
  9. Sunaryo & Joshi L. Peranan Pengetahuan Ekologi dalam Sistem Agroforestri. Bahan Ajaran Agroforestri 7. (2010); World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia: 1-28.
  10. Kongprasertamorn K. Local Wisdom, Environmental Protection and Community Development: The Clam Farmers in Tambon Bangkhunsai, Phetchaburi Province, Thailand. Manusya, (2020); 10(1): 1-10.
  11. Blackwell A, & Colmenar R. Transforming policy through local wisdom. Futures, (1999); 31(5): 487–497.
  12. Arikunto Prosedur Penelitian Ilmiah Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. (2013); Rineka Cipta.
  13. Miles M B & Huberman A M. Qualitative Data Analysis. (2017); Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
  14. Prayoga K, Riezky A M, Syuhada A R, Prayoga D S. Socio cultural and agricultural local wisdom by cetho indigenous community to preserve the nature. Agromix, (2020); 11(1): 21–32.
  15. Rambu A AD, Huruta A D , Lee, C W. Rural microfinance sustainability: Does local wisdom driven – governance work?. Journal of Cleaner Production, (2020); 1-10.
  16. Liao KH, Le, TA, Nguyen K. Van. Urban design principles for flood resilience: Learning from the ecological wisdom of living with floods in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Landscape and Urban Planning, (2016.); 15(5): 69–78.
  17. Pandapotan S, Silalahi, H. Social Capital as a Local Wisdom of Farmer in Managing Agricultural Resources in Lubuk Pakam Sub-district, Deli Serdang District. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, (2019); 2(4): 469–476.
  18. Istiawati FN. Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Adat Ammatoa. Jurnal Cendekia, (2016); 2(1): 34 – 40.
  19. Bangkara BMASA, Syuryadi M, Fadilah A. Indonesian Local Wisdom as Basis for People’s Intention to Buy Healthy Food. Multicultural Education, (2022); 8(1): 24-38.
  20. Suratiyah K. Ilmu Usahatani. (2011); Penebar Swadaya.
  21. Hernanto F. Ilmu Usahatani. (2016); Penebar Swadaya.
  22. Kuasa W, Rianse U, Widayati W, Sidu D, Abdullah W G, Zulfikar ZL, Syukur LO, Rianse IS. Local Wisdom of Farmers in Meeting of Local Food. International Journal of Sustainable Tropical Agricultural Sciences (IJSTAS), (2015); 2(1): 53-60.
  23. Padmowihardjono. Posisi Penyuluhan Pertanian dalam Dinamika Respon Usahatani Terhadap Tantangan Kemajuan. 2014; Departemen  Pertanian.
  24. Erliadi. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Petani Menggunakan Benih Varietas Unggul pada Usahatani Padi Sawah (Oryza sativa L.) di Kecamatan Mayek Payed, Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang. AGRISAMUDRA, (2015); 2(1): 91-100.
  25. Hamdana A, Kusnadi D, Harniati. Keberdayaan Petani dalam Penerapan Budidaya Padi Sawah Sister Jajar Legowo di Desa Babakankaret Kecamatan Cianjur Kabupaten Cianjur Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, (2020); 1(4): 747-758.
  26. Rika H. Agribisnis Perkebunan Rakyat Kopi Robusta di Kabupaten Solok. AGRISEP, (2015); 14(1): 11 – 25.
  27. Rosada I, Amran F D, Nurul A. Persepsi dan Motivasi Petani Terhadap Kearifan Lokal Dalam Berusaha Tani Padi (Studi Kasus Kearifan Lokal Mappalili di Desa Manakku, Kecamatan Labakkang, Kabupaten Pangkajene dan Kepulauan). Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem, (2022); 22(3): 487-499.
  28. Sari I P, Zuber A. Kearifan Lokal Dalam Membangun Ketahanan Pangan Petani. Journal of Development and Social Change, (2020); 3(2): 25-35.
  29. Raemon. Lulo Ngganda. Ritual Pasca Panen Pada Orang Tolaki : Analisis Interpretatif Fungional Atas Ritual Lulo Ngganda Di Desa Benua Kecamatan Benua Kabupaten Konawe Selatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. (2010); Kanisius.
  30. Arbi M, Junaidi Y, Januarti I, Sari S N. Identification of Farmers' Local Wisdom in Managing Lebak Swamp Land During the Covid-19 Pandemic Period in Keramasan Village, Palembang City, Indonesia. Budapest International Reserch and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), (2022); Vol 5 (3): 25876-25884.
  31. Ayu I W, Soemarno, Iskandar S, Gunawan, Oklima A M. Local Wisdom of Farming by Small Farmers in Rainfed Dryland of Pelat Village. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, (2019); 465: 372-376.
  32. Kozhanov Z, Serikbayeva A, Kozhanova N, Sydykov D, Sadvakassov K, Mukhametkaliev M. Impact of Functional Foods on Improving the Health of the Kazakh Population. Advancements in Life Sciences, (2023); 10(4): 555-562.
  33. Sholeha T W, Prasmatiwi F E, Lestari D A H. Ketahanan Dan Kemandirian Pangan Rumah Tangga Petani Padi Di Daerah Rawan Pangan Kecamatan Pagelaran Utara Kabupaten Pringsewu. Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis: Journal of Agribusiness Science, (2021); 9(2): 356-363.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. To read the copy of this license please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

6th button-01